Qualia Blossoms
Posted: Sunday, July 10, 2011
by Tony Brussat
http://qualiadelic.com
There is some debate about which is more important, a flower's seeds or its blossom. Seeds, of course, carry the flower's DNA into the next generation, but the blossom is the flower in full potential. In a human, we are slaves to our own seed, our own DNA; but we are also slaves to ideas, and if we live up to our best ideals, being honest, or tolerant, or courageous, or creative, or whatever is most meaningful to us, then we “blossom.”
Our schools also give us our first taste of science, which is almost entirely geared toward practical concerns, toward the DNA and the seeds of things. Fortunately, there are always geniuses who can't bear to specialize, and these visionaries have their sights upon the big picture. Such was Einstien, of course, but another was Goethe, who was interested, literally, in the blossom, the potential of a flower, not just the seed. John Ruskin summed up Goethe's holistic scientific view:
“The Spirit in the plant – that is to say, its power of gathering dead matter out of the wreck round it, and shaping it into its own chosen shape – is of course strongest in the moment of flowering, for it then not only gathers, but forms, with the greatest energy.”
Goethe, of course, is remembered for his literary gifts more than his science, as was Ruskin. It reflects poorly upon scientists, though, that they have prefered to focus upon the seeds of matter; in a way the scientific “seed-oriented” view reflects a primitive instinct which tends to see the world in terms of cycles of time which endlessly repeat, like the seasons of the year or the daily journey of the Sun. Ruskin, though, noticed something else about the blossoming flower:
“And where this life is in it at full power, its form becomes invested with aspects that are chiefly delightful to our own senses.”
That flowers appeal to us also reflects a primitive view, that all things were made for man; however, having the intuition of a poet, Ruskin was implying something else. He had no way of knowing, however, that what he was sensing in the blossom of a flower was the ultimate potential of qualiadelic relationships.
Qualia, in its simplest forms (like color, for instance), has the power to attract organisms. Things and creatures move toward qualia and form enduring relationships around it. Like individual people, individual flowers have some subtle perception of themselves, some awareness of the qualia which exists within themselves. Like us, they are compelled to express or to project that qualia, an outward manifestation of vague but powerful ideals. Our attraction for a flower blossom is not utilitarian; we do not move toward it like an insect who makes practical use of its nectar. We are not like scientists.
Instead, we are attracted to it because its potent striving is a beautiful tragedy, a heroic gasp toward some unknown, unsensed perfection, just like our own tragic attempts to make something of ourselves, and to find meaningfulness in life. The qualia within, the ideas and ideas that we have and live for, draw us toward a blossoming which will make the universe take note of us despite our insignificance.
This Article has been viewed 219 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)Good points
overall anything that works to both propagate and improve the species is the whole point of the exercise
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.